Plagiarism
- Share via
Your editorial asserts that honorable men like King and Bruno engaged in plagiarism--stole others’ work without attribution--but should be excused because they also “left a rich legacy of their own thoughts and deeds.” Academic honesty, you conclude, is really only for the “rest of us” who “will leave a less visible mark on the world.”
Such meandering in the field of ethics leads to a disturbing paradox: The theft of the thoughts of others is pardonable in original thinkers.
GEORGE P. CLARK
Pasadena
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
