Santa Clarita / Antelope Valley : Council Rejects Plans Favoring City Residents in Program Uses
- Share via
PALMDALE — Despite fears that county cutbacks could result in a run on city services, the City Council has rejected plans to give a preference to Palmdale residents over non-residents in using city library and recreation programs.
In unanimous votes Thursday night, the council rejected one proposal to begin charging non-residents a $20-a-year library card fee, and another proposal to either give Palmdale residents registration preference or begin charging non-residents higher fees for city recreation programs.
Council members voiced general support for giving city residents registration priority for recreation programs, though they did not enact such a plan. But they strongly rejected any approach that would go further in distinguishing between city and non-city residents.
Steve Hofbauer, a planning commission member, had recommended both proposals to the City Council in a June memo. Hofbauer said county budget cutbacks this year that closed county parks and closed or reduced library services could send non-city residents streaming into city programs.
“It would be nice to continue an ‘open arms’ policy. But budget realities preclude these benevolent practices,” Hofbauer wrote. “If we do not initiate a prioritized and two-tiered policies, we will be faced with inadequate service levels, (and) overcrowded or inadequate programs . . . “
City officials, however, said non-city residents make up a relatively small share of participants in the library and recreation programs. Library officials said about 20% of the borrowing is done by non-city residents. Recreation officials did not have any reliable percentage.
Also, a library card fee would have cut off the city’s participation in a range of library resources shared among different jurisdictions.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.